perm filename WOMEN.TEX[ESS,JMC] blob
sn#870640 filedate 1989-03-01 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 \chapter{33}{Technology and Women's Liberation}
C00016 ENDMK
Cā;
\chapter{33}{Technology and Women's Liberation}
First some comments on the housewife's position in society.
In terms of the interest of the work, how hard it is necessary to
work, and the amount of freedom, the position of the housewife is
somewhere between the 30th and 70th percentile in the scale of
desirability of occupations. This is an intuitive judgment and
depends on how the different aspects are weighted. One might
attempt to make it more precise by observing the choices that women
make between being a housewife and other occupations. This would be
difficult, but I don't think it would be a hopeless task.
Since World War II, the relative desirability of housewifery
has declined relative to other middle class occupations. This is
because working conditions in many other occupations have improved
with the increasing wealth of the country while the present set of
gadgets that improve the working conditions of the middle class
housewife has remained stable. Of course, the percentage of
housewives who have the middle class home and set of gadgets has
increased, and the housewives from groups whose position has
improved are not complaining as much as the others. The position of
the housewife in economic strata that could previously afford
domestic help may even declined.
All this has reduced the relative desirability of
housewifery and led to an increased demand for a better position for
women. It seems to me that there are substantial prospects for
improvement both through reorganization of institutions and through
technology but that this improvement will be slow.
To see this we must consider the options available to men
and women and also consider their relative bargaining positions.
Consider the following:
\item{1.}The institution of dating has an important effect on the
psychologies of men and women. A girl can wait and if she is
attractive good things may happen to her. It is not inevitable, but
there is grounds for hope. A boy motivated by sex, on the other
hand, knows that nothing will happen if he doesn't act. Learning
social initiative is hard for him, but there is no alternative. It
seems to me that this can account for much of the difference in
initiative between teenage boys and girls from which the subsequent
differences in occupational capability stem. (It should be pointed
out that much less than half of men develop much initiative, but the
percentage of women with initiative is much less). It would be
interesting to see where passive male homosexuals stand in the scale
of occupational initiative; it might clobber my theory.
\item{2.} It has been my observation that the dropout from hard
science by girls in high school is not primarily the fault of either
parents or school. It is much more the fault of the values of
present teen-age-girl society. Both boys and girls are affected
more by the ideas of their peers than by the official policies of
the educational institutions. A disproportionate number of adults
with initiative come from separatist social groups where the parents
prevent children from taking their values from their peers or from
the schools.
\item{3.}Getting more women in higher positions in society depends
on breaking this tradition. One possibility is batch processing
rather than continuous. Normally a school is a continuous
institution. Freshmen come in at the bottom and seniors go out at
the top. If the tradition is regarded as bad, we could experiment
with a system wherein a particular school is filled with freshmen
and no new ones are admitted until the first lot graduates. If a
new desirable tradition is successfully inculcated, then continuous
processing can be resumed. This idea might also work in prisons.
Another possibility is to teach initiative directly.
\item{4.} Consider the relative bargaining position of men and
women. A desirable man can get a woman reasonably content to serve
him in the traditional way. In return she gets a good income and a
social position derived from his. The conditions of middle class
life today are such that if life is to be smooth and gracious, there
ought to be someone spending close to full time managing the affairs
of the family, running errands, chauffering children, cleaning
house, getting things fixed, etc. In principle, if husband and wife
both want to work, this labor should be shared. However, a
desirable man can get better terms than this, and the academic
community is full of cases where a man first marries an intellectual
equal and then replaces her by a second wife without so many
ambitions outside the home.
\item{5.} The women's lib solution to this problem is to combine
propaganda about justice with a kind of women's trade unionism so
that men will no longer be able to get such affable wives. This will
change the situation somewhat, but will not bring about substantial
equality, because the change in bargaining positions will not be
large enough to do so.
\item{6.}Greater equality will be achieved if the amount of work
required to have a nice home with well brought up children can be
reduced to the point that a man who shares the work equally with his
wife suffers no disadvantage in his profession, and likewise a woman
who keeps a home going does not lose in her outside work.
\item{7.}This reduction in work can be brought about by new
technology. Specifically, an automatic delivery system can reduce
running errands. A safe transportation system that can be used by 6
year olds without help can obviate the need for chauffeuring
children, safe houses and personal telephones can obviate the need
for most babysitting, a more interactive and educational form of
children's entertainment than television can further reduce
babysitting, any further aids to keeping a house in order in the
direction of the household robot can further reduce the work.
\item{8.}Besides the gadgets, a variety of institutional aids are
necessary, the most essential of which is the much-demanded
widespread availability of day care centers. The problem with day
care centers is that for young children, there has to be one
attendant for every four children with present standards of care and
with present technology. The problem will be much eased if
technology could make it possible for one person to take care of
more children. I don't know enough about the problem to suggest
definite improvements, but I would bet that ways can be found to
reduce the amount of physical work in dressing, diapering, bathing,
feeding, etc. Besides this, ways can be found to increase the
number of interesting and educational games that involve interaction
with a computer rather than with humans. Perhaps it will also be
possible to use the computer to structure situations wherein the
children co-operate with each other in order to interact with the
computer.
\item{9.}It should be noted that some proposed solutions to other
problems will have a negative effect on the opportunities available
to women. If the convenience of operating a car is reduced, then a
person will have to live closer to his work. Guess whose work
people will live closer to?
\item{10.}Whatever improvements are made, there will always be
differences in the extent to which families choose to use them.
There will always be women who choose to make their families their
main activity. Therefore, the solutions adopted should not require
universal adherence, and experiments of all kinds should be
encouraged and even financed.
\item{11.}All these considerations may rate only contempt from
those who consider social problems mainly in moralistic terms.
Equality is desirable, and if men would only do the right thing, it
would be achieved. Well as far as I can see, mankind's ability to
respond to purely moral exhortation isn't improving very fast. Most
moral problems that have gone away, e.g. chastity, have succumbed to
technology not preaching.
\vfill\eject